A little more on Edwards, then I'll shut up about it.
So, Edwards admits to having the affair, but goes to great pains to stress that it was during the time his wife's cancer was in remission and that he is NOT the father of the baby because the affair ended too early to make that possible.
Why is this so important to Edwards?
Because Hunter's child is 5 months old.
That means the child was born somewhere around March, 2008
Which means the child must have been conceived around June of 2007.
On March 22, 2007, Elizabeth Edwards announced that her cancer had returned and was incurable.
If Edwards is the father of Hunter's baby, that means he was humping Hunter and spreading his demon seed with full knowledge that his wife had incurable cancer.
"Edwards said he was willing to take a paternity test to clear up the question.
"Happy to take a paternity test ... would love to see it happen," he said in an interview with ABC News."
Conveniently no father is listed on the birth certificate and a former Edwards campaign staffer, Andrew Young, has stepped forward to take one for the team and claims he is the father.
What, was she just the campaign crew-slut or something?
Young has even said he is willing to take a DNA test to clear the matter up once and for all.
But darn the luck, Hunter is refusing to participate.
"In a statement he provided to the Washington Post, attorney Robert Gordon said that Rielle Hunter is a private citizen and that she will not comment further on the media frenzy sparked Friday when Edwards publicly acknowledged the affair.
"She wishes to maintain her privacy" and the privacy of her child, Gordon said in the statement. "Furthermore, Rielle will not participate in DNA testing or any other invasion of her ... privacy now or in the future."
Could any of this parental ambiguity be tied to the roughly $114,000 Hunter received in 2006 and 2007 for "Website/Internet services"?
Again, just how fucking stupid do they think we are?
2 minutes ago